Strange as Angels

@ba-in-bs / ba-in-bs.tumblr.com

5'7" of whelm on a 5'4" frame. She/her/hers. Pan/Poly - Professional fangirl. People also occasionally pay me to help them capture souls on film.
Avatar
reblogged

Another worldbuilding application of the "two layer rule": To create a culture while avoiding The Planet Of Hats (the thing where a people only have one thing going for them, like "everyone wears a silly hat"): You only need two hats.

Try picking two random flat culture ideas and combine them, see how they interact. Let's say taking the Proud Warrior Race - people who are all about glory in battle and feats of strength, whose songs and ballads are about heroes in battle and whose education consists of combat and military tactics. Throw in another element: Living in diaspora. Suddenly you've got a whole more interesting dynamic going on - how did a people like this end up cast out of their old native land? How do they feel about it? How do they make a living now - as guards, mercenaries? How do their non-combatants live? Were they always warrior people, or did they become fighters out of necessity to fend for themselves in the lands of strangers? How do the peoples of these lands regard them?

Like I'm not shitting, it's literally that easy. You can avoid writing an one-dimensional culture just by adding another equally flat element, and the third dimension appears on its own just like that. And while one of the features can be location/climate, you can also combine two of those with each other.

Let's take a pretty standard Fantasy Race Biome: The forest people. Their job is the forest. They live there, hunt there, forage there, they have an obnoxious amount of sayings that somehow refer to trees, woods, or forests. Very high chance of being elves. And then a second common stock Fantasy Biome People: The Grim Cold North. Everything is bleak and grim up there. People are hardy and harsh, "frostbite because the climate hates you" and "stabbed because your neighbour hates you" are the most common causes of death. People are either completely humourless or have a horrifyingly dark, morbid sense of humour. They might find it funny that you genuinely can't tell which one.

Now combine them: Grim Cold Bleak Forest People. The summer lasts about 15 minutes and these people know every single type of berry, mushroom and herb that's edible in any fathomable way. You're not sure if they're joking about occasionally resorting to eating tree bark to survive the long dark winter. Not a warrior people, but very skilled in disappearing into the forest and picking off would-be invaders one by one. Once they fuck off into the woods you won't find them unless they want to be found.

You know, Finland.

Avatar

r/Antiwork is protecting r@pists

An outside, unvetted mod who has a history of informing to the FBI and as a serial rapist has been allowed to co-opt the space as the lead admin for the Discord and subreddit. She has removed and reinstated some of the old mods to ensure her and her lackeys have seniority so that if any of them are deposed control is still in her sphere of influence. Worse, she’s been a mod of r/rape and Contrapoints’ Discord for years. Here is the evidence:

Avatar

State of The Dating Union: Chillax

Something I don't understand about dating culture, especially in our app saturated world: early game urgency.

I'm a busy woman. Granted, my experience may not be universal and I may be far busier than your average person, or my experience may be fairly standard. I also may or may not have a greater or lesser amount of energy due to a greater or lesser amount of activities I cram into my days or because of neuroatypicality. I wouldn't know, to the best of my knowledge I've never been anyone else.

But like.. in my opinion most people would like a mate who is fairly engaged with their life, involved in a good amount of things, has happiness and things that they find fulfilling and are enthusiastic about that take them away from being plugged in 24/7. More than that, making conversation, auditioning extra people for an already pleasantly full life is a time commitment and is engineered in a monogamo-normative culture to be unsuccessful in a large percentage of your pairings, lets say like only 10-15% gain some traction much less become relationships.

So, why is it an issue if I answer messages early on with like 3-7 days on between fairly thought out responses when I have time, before I've met a person or gotten to know them? People are like "oh x messaged you at 2 AM when they hadn't spoken to you in days so we all know what that was about 🙄" well, maybe x is a millennial with a time consuming job and a lot of responsibilities. Maybe x just happens to do all of their medium to low priority recreational stuff at 2 AM because that's what millennials have these days. Like, chill, friend.

I just don't think the '(s)he's not that into you' narrative holds up as well as it may have in a previous dating culture. People are tired and overworked these days, and new people are always at our fingertips - possibly even when our life isn't prepared to give a new connection the time to form. What's more, it's not healthy to feel sucker punched in the face with neurochemicals if you match with someone or or receive one message - which is what that theory of relationship investment relies on. The heady mess of chemical fog in our brains that is reaching for the next fix. It's a new era, kids that doesn't happen over the span of a couple texts - and we may end up the better for it. Who knows, maybe we'll settle down into relationships that aren't first conceived in a complete KO of your decision making capacities.

The moral of the story is new era, new rules. Be kinder and understand we're all in the same capitalist trap, people don't have time for more arbitrary stress.

Avatar
reblogged

Goldman and Sachs literally fucking asked aloud if curing patients is a good business model.

Fuck this shit I want out of here

Holy fuck. Was this in a hearing? Sounds like it needs to be spread

Rich people are fucking monsters holy hell

In case you were wondering why we fucking hate capitalism.

Are the analysts really getting paid for that? Like… Can I please be paid for just stating the most obvious?

It’s almost like they forget that they can create new products. Cure hepatitis c? Go make and sell a cure for another disease. It’s not rocket science lol

this made me mad enough to make an actual political cartoon ugh hold on

I actually worked at a Pharma company for a year. The diseases we were focused on?

Asthma

Hayfever

Rheumatoid Arthritis

COPD

Notice that these are all diseases with no possible cure (they aren’t caused by an infective agent and can only be “managed”). These are diseases where people need treatment for the rest of their lives once diagnosed. This Pharma company’s trillion dollar innovation? An indigestion remedy.

Under capitalism, there’s no incentive to make a one-time cure for any disease - Gilead no doubt knew this and did it anyway. Kudos to them.

Avatar
Avatar
kingkrem

homestuck, for all its insanity, still has the best quotes, my favorite being “the circle of stupidity is complete”

mine might be that one karkat rant like ‘your vehicle is parked squarely in the ‘nobody gives a fuck’ zone’

Avatar
drkotobuki

“Yes sir we are literally under siege by planet fucking Jupiter.”

“shit. let’s be santa”

“i’m 13 u egg”

Avatar
yd12k

That might be the saddest thing I’ve ever heard get said.

Avatar
curlicuecal

Well you see, the explanation is perfectly simple and scientific.  It was because shut up.  Shut up is why.

I’d throw it in the lava but that would be a waste of melting

“How old are you?” “6” “Goddamn”

Kick it barak

TIME TO RENDEZVOUS WITH MY HOMIE KILLA AND DROP THE SPECIAL SCIENCE ON HIM

My personal favorite:

time to fly up away into the sun you fucknig piece of gargbage

KARKAT: THAT SOUNDS SUPER! DOESN’T THAT SOUND SUPER KANAYA? KANAYA: No KARKAT: I THINK I SPEAK FOR KANAYA WHEN I SAY IT SOUNDS Really Fucking Super.

Avatar
acidsbeats

“You have a hat full of bomb, a fist full of penis, and a head full of empty” is my favorite tbh

Avatar
noodlenumber
Avatar
direhuman
Avatar
cianm1301

“This is exactly why babies shouldn’t be allowed to dual wield flintlock pistols”

God launders in mysterious ways.

today is the only day i regard this post fondly. and i love that just around this time it explodes with notes and my activity is clogged with everyones additions of quotes.

Avatar
grimdarkmatt

SOLLUX: fr0m n0w 0n i sh0uld just wear a shirt that says d0n’t ask me ab0ut my disability 0r my m0rtality.

Avatar
Avatar
profeminist

AMAZING Resource Alert: Queer Books for Teens Finder!

LOOK AT ALL THE FILTERS YOU CAN SEARCH BY:

Updates and Changes

“Thank you so much for all the feedback you’ve sent in.   Here are some of the updates we’ve made recently:

  • The addition of romantic orientations to the search filters.
  • The addition of a best-of list with aromantic characters.
  • The addition of a best-of list with asexual characters.
  • Begin changes to the layout of each entry to include more specific information regarding the identities of characters in the books.
  • Links to book reviews by ownvoices reviewers about some of the titles.

Things we are still working on:

  • Continuing to work on each book entry to update it to our new format.
  • Adding more books by indie presses/self-published.

If you have more suggestions please don’t hesitate to email us at queerbooksforteens@gmail.com, especially if you have recommendations for self-published/indie press books or if you are an ownvoices book reviewer and would like us to link to your review.”

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
exeggcute

why is it that villains and not protagonists are always the ones breaking gender roles hmmmm 

Avatar
speedlimit15

it’s called queercoding and it’s intentional and basically brainwashes kids into having negative associations with those traits

it backfired. now i’m just hot for super villains.

Avatar

if you’re a baby gay and this is your first pride, watch your drinks! men are trash across all sexualities

I know boys don’t get these talks so let me clarify:

This doesn’t just mean alcohol

Don’t accept any open drinks

After you get your unopened drink, you keep it in your site

You have to go to the bathroom so you leave your drink on a table? That drink is now dead to you.

You’ve been holding your drink way low out of your eyesight and people are crowding? That drink is now suspect.

Stay safe, babies

Also: Rohypnol (a date rape drug) tastes VERY SALTY. If your drink is suddenly salty, STOP DRINKING IMMEDIATELY. 

Avatar
bigmouthlass

Buddy system, y'all. If your friend is acting *way* drunker than they should, take them to an Urgent Care or ER. Date rape drugs can kill you.

always rb

Avatar
coneybitch

rb for the advice

And not just the boys, but girls too.

Just because you’re in a bar or club with only other women does not mean you are inherently safe.

My best friend got drugged by a girl in an all female bar and was almost raped in the bathroom.

Always remember to be careful.

Alllll of this. I’ve seen some shit at pride man… Be safe

Avatar
reblogged

character aesthetics → asterismz requested: IPRE!Lup

Listen. That stuff I was saying down there- that wasn’t just talk. I believe that, one of these times, we’re gonna get it right. And we’re gonna find a way to defeat the Hunger and.. save everybody inside of it. I have to believe that, to keep doing what we do.
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
systlin

Anyway, if you read marriage certificates from church records, a full 85% of first marriages for young women were around 18-19 years old. The rest skewed higher, into the early twenties, with only a few being below that age and only one in a thousand was younger than 16. 

The age of puberty has declined over the centuries as girls get better nutrition, as well, so throughout the middle ages the age at which a girl could expect her first period was around 16, where modern girls often get it much younger. 

The idea that women in earlier ages were married and mothers in their early teens is a myth. Marriages of children were usually only between noble families, and made for political reasons, or creepy old bastards who wanted a child-wife and could get away with it because they were rich and powerful. They often would point to the fact that the Roman elite did the same thing as justification. The Romans, of course, would point to the Greeks doing the same thing as justification, the Greeks pointed at the Assyrians, and so on back through the ages. 

It was considered disgusting by normal people then and still is. 

This myth is still brought out and touted by sick fuckers. Know it for what it is; a falsehood. 

And EVEN among the nobility marriages at such a young age were a much rarer occasion than those apologists would make you believe.

Let’s look an an egregious example, Henry the bloody VIII:

First marriage:

He was 18, Katharine of Aragon was 23.

Second marriage:

He was 40/41, Anne Boleyn, depending on which theory you believe, was anywhere between 24 to 32.

Third marriage:

He was 44, Jane Seymour was 28.

Fourth marriage:

He was 48, Anne of Cleves was 25

Fifth marriage:

He was 48, Catherine Howard, depending on which source you believe, was between 17-22. And yes, people at the time actually were squicked out by this age difference. And rightly so.

Sixth marriage:

He was 51, Catherine Parr was 31. 

Even the most notorious LECHER and WIFE MURDERER in history did not marry teenagers in at least 5 if not 6 out of 6 marriages. 

And here’s another Tudor tidbit, both Henry VII and VIII knew how traumatic and damaging it is for women marrying/having children too young. Henry VII’s mother was married at 12 and gave birth to Henry VII at 13. It caused so much damage and trauma that she never had another child after him despite being married three times.

So yes CUT THAT SHIT OUT. Teenage girls are NOT adults and anyone preying on them is pure evil.

YOU 

I LIKE YOU

And as for the marriage of Elizabeth Woodville to King Edward IV, she was 27 at the time. He? Was 22. 

She had been married before, and did marry young…at the age of sixteen or seventeen, to Sir John Gray, who was about five years her senior. 

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.